Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11707/7279
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKrapova, Iliyana-
dc.contributor.authorCinque, Guglielmo-
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-08T08:18:40Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-08T08:18:40Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11707/7279-
dc.description.abstractDespite certain parallelisms, DPs and CPs also reveal profound differences. Here, we focus on one crucial difference between them: the one concerning extraction. Inmany languages extraction from (complement) DPs is more severely constrained than extraction from (complement) CPs (as we show on the basis of Italian and Bulgarian, in particular). We will try to derive this difference from a difference in the internal make-up of DPs and CPs in interaction with Phase Theory and a version of Rizzi’s Relativized Minimality which partly modifies Starke’s (2001) and Krapova and Cinque’s (2008) specific implementation to deal with order preservation as in multiple wh-fronting in languages like Bulgarian.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleDP and CP: a Relativized Minim- ality approach to one of their non parallelismsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Rivista di Grammatica Generativa : Research in Generative Grammar (RGG)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
02. Krapova-Cinque.pdf188.76 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.