Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11707/4309
Title: Locality of Wh-movement and the Individuation of Events
Authors: Truswell, Robert
Keywords: Generative Grammar
Syntax
Locality
Issue Date: 2007
Publisher: University College London
Abstract: I propose a novel characterisation of the counterexamples to the generalisation that wh-movement out of an adjunct is impossible. The thesis discusses three classes of exceptions,namely extraction from in order clauses (1a), prepositional participial adjuncts (1b), and bare present participial adjuncts (1c). (1) a. What are you working so hard [in order to achieve t]? b. Who did John go home [after talking to t]? c. What did John drive Mary crazy [whistling t]? These contrast with cases where extraction is impossible (2). (2) a. * What did you get upset [because Mary said t]? b. * Who have you been really happy [since talking to t]? c. * What does John work [whistling t]? These two groups do not form natural syntactic classes, but are distinguishable in event-structural terms. The minimal constituent containing the head and foot of the chain in (1) describes a single event, on an appropriate definition of event, but does not in (2). Accordingly, I propose the following condition: (3) Wh-questions carry a presupposition that the minimal constituent containing the head and the foot of the chain describes a single event. Wh-movement is permitted only if the denotation of that minimal constituent can be construed accordingly. Chapter 2 of the thesis develops a formal and cognitively well-motivated model of the internal structure of events. Key to this model is the recursively defined notion of extended events, corresponding to plan formation. This recursion crucially allows (3) to capture long-distance A0-dependencies. Chapter 3 applies this model, assuming (3), to locality data, deriving the contrast between (1) and (2), as well as other data such as the absolute prohibition on extraction from tensed adjuncts (2a), and the distinction between bridge verbs and factive islands (4). (4) a. What did John think [that Mary did t]? b. * What did John regret [that Mary did t]?
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11707/4309
Appears in Collections:Dissertations (restricted access)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Truswell.pdf1.27 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.