Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11707/4290
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorToole, Janine-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-03T16:53:23Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-03T16:53:23Z-
dc.date.issued1997-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11707/4290-
dc.description.abstractThe unifying theme of this thesis is the interpretation of definite noun phrases. Three outstanding issues relating to their interpretation are addressed. The first issue concerns the uniqueness implications associated with definite noun phrases. Unlike the Russellian and familiarity approaches which argue that the basic characteristic that differentiates definite noun phrases from other noun phrases is uniqueness or anaphoricity, I argue that the basic characteristic of a definite noun phrase is the relation that holds between its denotation and its doman restriction. That is, on the analysis I propose the relation between a definite noun phrase's denotation and its domain restriction is on of equality (denotation = domain restriction). The relation between an indefinite noun phrase's denotation and its domain restriction is one of subsumption (denotation § domain restriction). [...]en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSimon Fraser Universityen_US
dc.subjectGenerative Grammaren_US
dc.subjectSyntaxen_US
dc.subjectSemanticsen_US
dc.titleUniqueness Intuitions, Telescope Anaphora, and Strong and Weak Readings in Donkey Sentencesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Dissertations (restricted access)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SemanticInterpretation of DefNPs.pdf4.49 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.