Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMutschler, Fritz-Heiner
dc.description.abstractUsing the classics as its textual basis, the article presents a series of comparative observations on Greco-Roman and Chinese historiography. The first part of the paper tries to show that the main structural differenence between Western and Chinese historigraphy: continuous flow of narrative vs. juxtaposition of a plurality of smaller units of representation, finds its correspondence in a marked difference in terms of contents: stronger interest in wars and thus in change vs. stronger interest in the peace side of history and thus in the state of things. The second part makes the point that in certain respects Roman and Chinese historigraphy are closer to each other than each of them is to Greek historiography. Whereas the latter aims at inducing knowledge and understading and interprets history in terms of human drives and abilities, the former are more concerned with moral effect and see moral and immoral conduct as reasons for political failure and
dc.publisherPadova, Editoriale Programmait
dc.relation.ispartofAnnali di Ca' Foscari : Rivista della Facoltà di Lingue e Letterature straniere dell'Università di Ca' Foscari, 1998, vol. 37 (3), pp. 439-466it
dc.titleLa memoria del passato. Un confronto tra la storiografia greco-romana e la storiografia cinese anticait
Appears in Collections:Annali di Ca' Foscari. Serie orientale

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mutschler_p. 439-466.pdf1.44 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.