|
Lear >
Department of Language Sciences >
University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics (UVWPL) >
University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 2001 (vol. 11) >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10278/165
|
| Title: | Against Optional and Null Clitics. Right Dislocation vs. Marginalization |
| Author⁄s: | Cardinaletti, Anna |
| Date issued: | 2001 |
| Type of document: | Working Paper |
| Is part of: | Working Papers in Linguistics, 11, 2001, pp. 7-43. |
| Publisher: | Venezia, Dipartimento di Scienze del Linguaggio. Università Ca' Foscari |
| Abstract: | This paper contains a discussion of (Italian) Right Dislocation, which seems to instantiate an optional anticipatory clitic pronoun. It will be shown that the distribution of the anticipatory pronoun is not free. When the clitic is absent, we do not have an instance of Right Dislocation, but of Marginalization. The structural analysis of Right Dislocation suggested here is similar to Kayne’s (1994) analysis of English Right Dislocation, the structure of Marginalization contains an in situ destressed constituent. Depending on how optionality is interpreted, it is possible to conclude that clitic pronouns are neither optional nor null. |
| Language: | eng |
| Access rights: | open |
| Appears in Collections: | University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics (UVWPL) >University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 2001 (vol. 11)
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | Accessibility |
| 2001-1s-Cardinaletti.pdf | 429.41 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open
|
|
Items in Lear are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|